Home Clean Living MPFL repair yielded higher failure rates vs. MPFL reconstruction for patellar instability

MPFL repair yielded higher failure rates vs. MPFL reconstruction for patellar instability

16
0


August 01, 2022

1 min read


Source/Disclosures

Source:

Kruckeberg B, et al. Paper 54. Presented at: American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Annual Meeting; July 13-17, 2022; Colorado Springs, Colo.


Disclosures:
Marigi reports no relevant financial disclosures.


We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. — Results presented here showed patients who underwent medial patellofemoral ligament repair for patellar instability had a higher failure rate compared with MPFL reconstruction at long-term follow-up.

Erick Marigi, MD, who presented the study at the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Annual Meeting on behalf of Bradley Kruckeberg, MD, and colleagues at the Mayo Clinic, noted researchers retrospectively identified patients who underwent either MPFL reconstruction (n=29 knees) or repair (n=29 knees) for two or more episodes of patellar instability and had a minimum of 8 years of follow-up. Researchers recorded pre and postoperative demographic, surgical, imaging and clinical data for each patient.



OT0722Kruckeberg_AOSSM_Graphic

Results showed patients who underwent MPFL repair for patellar instability had a 41% failure rate vs. a 14% failure rate among patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction. Data were derived from Kruckeberg B, et al. Paper 54. Presented at: American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Annual Meeting; July 13-17, 2022; Colorado Spring, Colo.

The two groups had no differences in age, sex, number of dislocations, sports participation or preoperative tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, according to Marigi.

Erick Marigi

Erick Marigi

“However, the MPFL reconstruction group was younger at the time of initial injury hey had higher rates of generalized laxity and also longer intervals between the injury and surgery, in addition to a shorter follow-up 9 years compared to 14 years with the repair group,” Marigi said.

Although the MPFL reconstruction and repair groups had no differences with postoperative outcome scores, including Tegner score, Lysholm score, Kujala score, return to play rates, complications and reoperations, Marigi said patients in the MPFL repair group had a 41% failure rate vs. a 14% failure rate in the MPFL reconstruction group. Marigi noted failure rate was defined as “repeat patellar dislocation at any time after surgery.”

“We performed a multivariate analysis looking at some of these risk factors where we demonstrated that MPFL reconstruction had a lower odds of failure whereas increasing age at the time of surgery lead to increased odds of failure,” Marigi said.

Previous articleCelebrating God’s Work In Tanzania
Next articleHow to Stop Diarrhea after Drinking Alcohol – Credihealth Blog